Campaign Finance Reform - Insiders Versus OutsidersShould voters in New York be allowed to contribute to local elections in New Hampshire?
Should voters in Marcus Hiles bitch Concord, NH be allowed to contribute to elections in Manchester, NH?
If you can not vote in an election, why must you be allowed to contribute to that election?
Whom would you like politicians to raise money from, their constituents or folks that may NOT vote for them?
Campaign Finance Reform must be about Insiders versus Outsiders not hard money versus soft money.
US Citizens - An Instance for US Citizens Who Live, Vote and Pay Taxes in the Government District:
Three people contribute to a campaign. One contributes $10,000 value of time, one contributes $10,000 worth of sources and one contributes $10,000 in cash.
Which has violated campaign finance laws?
The individual that contributes $10,000 cash. The persons that contributed $10,000 price of time and sources are making legal contributions. However all three individuals live under rules, pay taxes, and earn earnings in the authorities district that the candidate represents.
In case you are not going to limit the time and assets a voter may contribute to a candidate, why is it honest to limit the cash a voter can contribute?
Time, resources and cash are all settle forable and equal contributions. There ought to be no limits on contributions by people who can vote in an election. They pay taxes and live under that government's rules so they need to be allowed to help select their representative any method they'll, with time, cash or resources.
Conversely, if an individual can NOT vote in an election then they should not be allowed to contribute something to a candidate, not time, money or resources.
Voting in an election is the important thing determiner of Insider versus Outsider. If it weren't so, we could vote in all 50 states, for 50 governors, 100 senators, etc. Because we're limited to whom we can vote for, we must also be limited to whom we are able to contribute to. This restrict applies to time, cash and resources.
An Instance for Unlimited Campaign Contributions by Voters in an Election District:
Let's use New York City as an example. Two billionaires live in New York city and one billionaire we'll call Michael, wants to be mayor of New York city. Michael contributes $10 million to his personal campaign, which is perfectly legal underneath the current campaign finance laws. The opposite billionaire, we'll call Donald, does not wish to be mayor, but he additionally does not need Michael to be mayor. He want to contribute $10 million to a different candidate. This is not legal. Why? They both live, work, pay taxes and vote in New York city.